Someone recently came into my channel asking me for the sources to Gentoox (obviously didn't have a clue, since the sources are all over the internet) so that he could sell Gentoox on DVD (even though it fits on a CD) for a profit, $160 per DVD to be exact. If you are going to buy a CD of Gentoox from someone, you should expect to pay no more than $1.50 for the CD + shipping and handling on top of this price. Even this is being generous, since CD's in bulk quantity cost about $0.10 each. Anything else is just a ripoff. Remember, you dont have to pay for Gentoox at all. You can download it from this site using the download link on the left.

These people are sponges, they wait for someone else to do the work, then try and sell it because they are pathetic sub-human scum who have no talent of their own. Be warned.

*Update*
I guess this is just further proof that the GPL needs clarification. I interpreted "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy" to mean that you may charge for the cost of transferring a copy. Stupidly, what this is intended to mean is that you may charge an unlimited amount of money for transferring the copy. In my opinion, this is an absolutely ridiculous statement because if it was omitted, the license would still be just as complete as if it was in there. It just serves to cause confusion. This being said, I withdraw my claims that it is illegal, but still stand by everything else I have said.

Also, consider this example. It is possible to make money from a GNU/GPL distributed software package, and it is encouraged by the FSF, but when you distribute the software, you have to give the identical rights you have to the software to the person you are providing it to. Therefore, if I decided to sell Gentoox for $1000, and only one person bought it, he would be entitled to upload it to a website and distribute it for free. So how does this make it possible for me to sell further copies? Sounds pretty flawed to me.